Introduction

Empathy represents a complex psychological ability of an individual to understand the emotional states of other people, share their experiences, and respond appropriately, thereby forming one of the basic pillars of social interactions. This construct includes three interconnected dimensions – cognitive, affective, and behavioral. The cognitive component of empathy enables identification and interpretation of another person’s emotions, the affective dimension refers to the ability for emotional resonance, and behavioral empathy represents the application of these abilities in concrete actions. In the context of healthcare provision, the behavioral aspect of empathy becomes particularly significant, where empathetic understanding is translated into practical interventions and professional behavior of the healthcare worker (Decety, 2025). Although empathy is considered an essential part of clinical practice, contemporary theoretical approaches emphasize that it is neither a unitary nor static construct, but a dynamic ability shaped by contextual and situational factors and composed of several dimensions that influence each other (Gamble et al., 2024).

The importance of empathy in healthcare is justified by several aspects. Above all, it forms the basis of patient-centered care, which reflects patients’ individual needs, values, and preferences. Through an empathetic approach, healthcare professionals can build high-quality therapeutic relationships based on trust, respect, and open communication. Such relationships play a key role in the treatment process, since patients who trust care providers tend to share relevant information more openly, adhere more diligently to recommended therapeutic procedures, and participate more actively in caring for their own health (Stewart et al., 2024). From the patients’ perspective, physicians and healthcare professionals who, besides high professional competence, display respectful and considerate communication are especially positively evaluated (Broadbridge et al., 2023). This patient-based perception of healthcare staff translates into a higher level of trust, which in turn supports better adherence to treatment recommendations and contributes to increased satisfaction and active patient engagement in healthcare processes (Arshad et al., 2024).

Besides the benefits manifested in the relationship between healthcare professionals and patients, empathy also plays a significant role in coping with and solving difficult situations that are an inherent part of the medical profession. Through an empathetic approach, interpersonal relationships at the workplace are strengthened, job satisfaction rises, and emotional resilience among healthcare staff is supported. In the context of managing burdening situations, empathy can be understood as an individual’s personal resource, with the potential to improve the quality of relationships with patients and strengthen the subjective experience of meaningful work; however, when emotional regulation is insufficient, it can also contribute to increased psychological strain. Empirical research indicates that the cognitive dimension of empathy is strongly associated with active coping strategies such as seeking solutions and proactive handling of problematic situations, while elevated affective empathy and personal distress are associated with emotional exhaustion and a higher risk of burnout (Shoji et al., 2024).

Research Methodology

The study was designed as a quantitative cross-sectional empirical study focused on examining relationships between empathy and ways of coping with demanding situations in the medical profession. Data collection was carried out between January and April 2024 using standardized research instruments. The study included 145 physicians working in different types of healthcare facilities in the Slovak Republic, who voluntarily agreed to participate and provided informed consent. The average age of respondents was 31 years, and the average length of total professional practice was 5.73 years. Respondents also reported an average length of employment at their current workplace of 4.02 years. In terms of sociodemographic structure, women accounted for a substantial part of the sample (61%). More than two-thirds of participants worked on inpatient hospital wards in a two-shift system. Participants were informed in detail about the aims, process, and significance of the study before data collection began. Participation was voluntary, and respondents were guaranteed anonymity, as well as confidential processing of the collected data, which were used exclusively for scientific research.

Standardized psychodiagnostic methods were used for data collection, specifically the DE14 questionnaire and the Coping Strategy Indicator (CSI). These tools were supplemented by a dedicated section aimed at determining basic sociodemographic and work characteristics of study participants. The assessed variables included age, gender, highest educational attainment, total length of professional practice, length of service at the current workplace, type of workplace, type of shift system, and type of organization. These data were obtained through a custom set of items forming a separate part of the research instrument.

The DE14 questionnaire (Tišanská, Kožený, 2012) is focused on assessing empathetic behavior in a broader, general context. The level of empathy is operationalized through three main dimensions. The first is sensitivity (VN), which reflects an individual’s tendency to continuously develop cognitive and emotional potential, not only through formal forms of education but also through alternative and informal educational resources, including observational learning. The second assessed dimension is openness (OT), characterized by an individual’s willingness to reassess habitual patterns of thought and behavior, as well as the ability to accept new stimuli coming from socially or culturally different environments. The third dimension is respect (RE), which expresses the degree of acceptance of other people, their views, attitudes, and convictions. Respondents indicate their degree of agreement with individual statements via a seven-point Likert scale ranging from 1 – strongly disagree to 7 – strongly agree. The CSI questionnaire – Coping Strategy Indicator (Amirkhan, 1990) contains 33 items related to various ways of coping with stressful situations. In the introductory part of the questionnaire, respondents presented and briefly described a specific demanding situation, after which the individual items were linked. The questionnaire items address three subscales representing stress coping strategies: seeking social support, problem solving, and avoidance. Responses were recorded on a four-point Likert scale (1 – yes, 2 – rather yes, 3 – rather no, 4 – no).

The collected data were subjected to statistical processing and analysis using PSPP (version 25) and Microsoft Excel. In the descriptive analysis, basic descriptive statistical procedures were applied, including calculation of absolute and relative values (N, %), measures of central tendency represented by the arithmetic mean (M), and a measure of variability expressed by the standard deviation (SD). Minimum and maximum values of analyzed variables were also determined. To assess relationships between variables, the nonparametric correlation method of Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used. Statistical significance was evaluated at the predetermined significance level α = 0.05.

Assessment of the Relationship Between the Level of Empathy and Coping with Challenging Situations

In the correlation analyses, the relationship between the level of empathy and preferred ways of coping with stressful situations was examined. A review of the results is presented in Table 1. The analysis confirmed the existence of several statistically significant relationships between selected variables.

A significant positive relationship was identified between using social support as a coping strategy and the empathy dimensions of sensitivity (r = 0,168; p < 0,05) and openness (r = 0,360; p < 0,01). This result suggests that respondents who more frequently rely on social support in challenging situations show a higher degree of ability to perceive the needs and perspectives of others, as well as greater openness toward differing opinions and attitudes. Further, a statistically significant positive relationship was found between problem-solving strategy and the openness dimension (r = 0,277; p < 0,01), indicating that individuals preferring active and analytical approaches to solving stressful situations are also more open to alternative perspectives and interpretations of problems.

Conversely, a significant negative correlation was found between avoidance strategy and the openness dimension (r = −0,281; p < 0,01). This relationship indicates that a higher degree of using avoidant coping strategies is associated with a lower level of openness to new stimuli and perspectives.

Table 1. Correlation analysis between social intelligence and ways of coping with challenging situations

Table 1Download Excel
DE14_Respect DE14_Sensitivity DE14_Openness
N 145 145 145
CSI - Social support Correlation Coefficient -0,135 ,168* ,360**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0,105 0,044 0
N 145 145 145
CSI - Problem solving Correlation Coefficient -0,07 -0,011 ,277**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0,406 0,895 0,001
N 145 145 145
CSI - Avoidance Correlation Coefficient -0,136 -0,105 -,281**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0,102 0,211 0,001
N 145 145 145

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Discussion

The results of our study of the relationship between empathy and stress-coping strategies in the medical profession are consistent with the growing body of evidence that the quality of the patient–clinician relationship and healthcare professionals’ personal coping significantly influence not only their professional well-being but also patient outcomes. Multiple studies conducted among healthcare workers clearly show that higher levels of empathy are associated with more adaptive stress-coping strategies and lower levels of burnout. In the study by Shoji et al. (2024) with Japanese healthcare workers (physicians, nurses, and residents), it was shown that cognitive empathy was positively associated with active stress coping and better professional quality of life, while personal distress was linked to higher burnout and increased use of less functional coping strategies. Similar findings were reported in studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare workers with higher empathy and at the same time the ability to regulate their own distress more often used problem-focused coping strategies, whereas avoidant strategies were associated with lower empathy and higher psychological exhaustion (Calegari, J. G. et al., 2022). In the study by Abou Hashish, Atalla (2023) carried out among nurses in a university hospital using the CSI questionnaire together with measures of professional quality of life, positive correlations were found between problem-focused strategies and seeking social support and compassion. Another finding was that avoidant strategies were significantly associated with fatigue and emotional exhaustion. These findings indicate that coping strategies captured by CSI are closely linked to emotional aspects of professional functioning that are directly tied to empathy. A large longitudinal study published in JAMA Network Open showed that patients treated by physicians with a high level of empathy achieved better long-term health outcomes. The authors also point out that an empathetic approach may reduce conflicts, improve communication, and thereby lower physicians’ emotional burden, creating favorable conditions for adaptive coping (Licciardone, et al., 2024).

Conclusion

Empathy represents a complex ability to perceive and understand the emotional experience of others, as well as to respond appropriately to it. This sensitivity to other people’s perspectives allows individuals in demanding and problematic situations to apply problem-solving strategies that reflect the views, attitudes, and preferences of other actors. As a result, there is a shift away from rigid and one-sided approaches toward flexible search for consensual and socially acceptable solutions.

Based on existing theoretical premises and empirical findings, it can be stated that higher levels of empathy, especially its cognitive component, are consistently and over the long term associated with the use of functional coping strategies, such as problem solving and seeking social support. Conversely, personal distress represents a maladaptive dimension of empathy, associated with a preference for avoidant forms of stress coping and with increased risk of burnout.

Author: PhDr. Valéria Parová, PhD. Univerzita Pavla Jozefa Šafárika,Lekárska fakulta, Ústav ošetrovateľstva

List of Bibliographic References

ABOU HASHISH, Ebtsam Aly – ATALLA, Amal Diab Ghanem. 2023. The relationship between coping strategies, compassion satisfaction, and compassion fatigue. In SAGE Open Nursing. ISSN 2377-9608, 2023, vol. 9, pp. 1–11.

AMIRKHAN, H. James. 1990. Factor analytically derived measure of coping: The coping strategy indicator. In Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ISSN 1066-1074, 1990, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 168-172.

ARSHAD, Maham, et al. 2024. Mediating role of physician’s empathy between physician’s communication and patient satisfaction. In Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. ISSN 2249-4863, 2024, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1530–1534.

BROADBRIDGE, Elizabeth, et al. 2023. The influence of perceived provider empathic communication on disclosure decision-making. In Health Communication. ISSN 1041-0236, 2023, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1807–1824.

CALEGARI, Jessica Graziella. et al. 2022. Coping strategies and professional quality of life during COVID-19. In Journal of Nursing Management. ISSN 0966-0429, 2022, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 4054–4063.

DECETY, Jean – LI, Joanna. 2025. The value of empathy in medical practice: A neurobehavioral perspective. In Social Sciences & Humanities Open. ISSN 2590-2911, 2025, no. 12.

GAMBLE, R. S. et al., 2024. The role of external factors in affect-sharing and their neural bases. In Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. ISSN 0149-7634, 2024, vol. 157, Article 105540.

LICCIARDONE, Jan, et al. 2024. Physician empathy and chronic pain outcomes. In JAMA Network Open. ISSN 2574-3805, 2024, vol. 7, no. 4, e246026.

SHOJI, Kotaro, et al., 2024. Empathy and coping strategies predict quality of life in Japanese healthcare professionals. In Behavioral Sciences. ISSN 2076-328X, 2024, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 400.

STEWART, Moira, et al. 2024. Patient-Centered Medicine: Transforming the Clinical Method. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 362 p. ISBN 978-1-003-39467-9.

TIŠANSKÁ, Lýdie – KOŽENÝ, Jiří. 2012. Development and psychometric analysis of the empathy questionnaire DE14. In Československá psychologie. ISSN 1804-6436, 2012, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 121–135.